Following is the
exact abstract of an article published in
the February 2, 2005 issue of the
Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
It is an astounding piece of information
that very few of us would even hear about.
It seems that stories like this don't
attract as much attention as ones that
describe the horrors of sun exposure.
It seems to be
"common knowledge" that our sun is a danger
to our health, especially our skin health.
It's true, too much sun, like too much of
anything, can be harmful. Heck, even too
much water can kill you. The point of this
article is that SUNLIGHT MIGHT ACTUALLY
BE GOOD FOR US. It seems that people
with melanoma (the most serious,
life-threatening form of skin cancer)
actually experience better survival rates
when they are exposed to the sun's rays.
This flies in
the face of conventional wisdom that tells
us to slather on the sunscreens and cover
every inch of exposed skin.
The cat's out of
the bag. The sun is our friend.
Perhaps the makers of sunscreens would find
this disquieting and maybe that's why this
hasn't popped up in the media. Our terror of
the sun should be replaced by a healthy
respect. I think that's a good thing.
It seems that
sunshine has been given a bad name.
Even television advertising is encouraging
all of us to coat ourselves with the newest
sun blocking chemicals. I advise everyone I
know to be cautious about using those
products. First, they may actually be part
of the problem. Second, they can give a user
a false sense of security. The advertising
suggests that you are PROTECTED once you're
buttered up. That can easily lead to
overexposure. And, as I said above -
overexposure seems to be the real culprit
when it comes to UV rays and skin problems.
Wouldn't
it be an odd thing if natural sunlight
was better for us than all the
antidepressants and anti-anxiety drugs our
health system throws at us?
If free sunlight could actually help us
who'd buy the drugs - and who'd apply the
sun blockers?
Journal of
the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 97,
No. 3, 195-199, February 2, 2005. Marianne
Berwick, Bruce K. Armstrong, Leah Ben-Porat,
Judith Fine, Anne Kricker, Carey Eberle,
Raymond Barnhill
Background: Melanoma incidence and
survival are positively associated, both
geographically and temporally. Solar
elastosis, a histologic indicator of
cutaneous sun damage, has also been
positively associated with melanoma
survival. Although these observations raise
the possibility that sun exposure increases
melanoma survival, they could be explained
by an association between incidence and
early detection of melanoma. We therefore
evaluated the association between measures
of skin screening and death from cutaneous
melanoma.
Methods:
Case subjects (n = 528) from a
population-based study of cutaneous melanoma
were followed for an average of more than 5
years. Data, including measures of
intermittent sun exposure, perceived
awareness of the skin, skin self-screening,
and physician screening, were collected
during in-person interviews and review of
histopathology and histologic parameters
(i.e., solar elastosis, Breslow thickness,
and mitoses) for all of the lesions.
Competing risk models were used to compute
risk of death (hazard ratios [HRs], with 95%
confidence intervals [CIs]) from melanoma.
All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: Sunburn, high intermittent sun
exposure, skin awareness histories, and
solar elastosis were statistically
significantly inversely associated with
death from melanoma. Melanoma thickness,
mitoses, ulceration, and anatomic location
on the head and neck were statistically
significantly positively associated with
melanoma death. In a multivariable competing
risk analysis, skin awareness (with versus
without, HR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3 to 0.9, P =
.022) and solar elastosis (present versus
absent, HR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.8, P =
.009) were strongly and independently
associated with melanoma death after
adjusting for Breslow thickness, mitotic
index, and head and neck location, which
were also independently associated with
death.
Conclusion:
Sun exposure is
associated with increased survival from
melanoma.
Affiliations of
authors: University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM (MB); University of Sydney,
Sydney, Australia (BKA, AK); Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
(LBP); University of Connecticut Health
Center, Farmington, CT (JF); Albert Einstein
College of Medicine, New York, NY (CE);
University of Miami, Miami, FL (RB)
Correspondence to: Marianne Berwick, PhD,
MPH, University of New Mexico, Department of
Internal Medicine, New Mexico Cancer
Research Facility, MSC08 4630, Room 103A, 1
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
87131 (mberwick@salud.unm.edu).
Open 9:00 am to 5:00 pm
(CT)
Monday through Friday
Closed on major U.S. holidays
Our 100%
Satisfaction Guarantee.
If you are not delighted with anything you purchase from us, let us
know, and we'll do our best to fix it for you.
Disclaimer:
Any health related information is for educational purposes only.
None of the information provided here is to be construed as medical
advice. Before applying any therapy or use of herbs, you may want to
seek advice from your health care professional. The information on
our website should not be a substitute for physician evaluation or
treatment by a health care professional and is not intended to
provide or confirm a diagnosis.