Merck has been testing a new drug to
help lower cholesterol. It's called Cordaptive, and its active
ingredient is niacin (vitamin B3). Until now, niacin has
been available without a prescription from pharmacies and health
food stores. Doctors routinely recommend it for patients with a high
cholesterol level because it has been shown to lower the levels of
both total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), or “bad
cholesterol.” However, Cordaptive also contains the experimental new
drug laropiprant, which was supposedly added to reduce the redness
and warming of the face and neck that are often caused by niacin.
Cordaptive has not yet been approved by
the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but that approval will
probably be granted soon. Is this good news or not? Merck hasbeen losing sales because that company’s trade-name anticholesterol drug, Zocor, has experienced significantly lower
sales since its generic version (simvastatin)
was introduced in 2006. If Cordaptive is successful, it can help
bolster those sagging sales figures.
If you agree that a drug like Cordaptive
will benefit your health, you must first believe that even a mildly
elevated cholesterol level can lead to a medical problem such as
heart disease. Although it is true that patients with a heart
problem often have elevated cholesterol levels, it is not perfectly
clear that a high level of cholesterol causes heart disease. The
presumed cause-and-effect relationship between high cholesterol and
cardiovascular disease is widely held, so it seems reasonable to
find drugs that will lower cholesterol levels. Merck and other
pharmaceutical manufacturers are ever on the lookout for drugs they
can patent. It makes good business sense for Merck to identify and
market such a drug. Does it make other sense?
I'm concerned about the addition of
laropiprant to Cordaptive. The articles I've read indicate that
laropiprant is an experimental drug. Its only use in Cordaptive is
to reduce the flushing (redness, burning, and tingling of the face)
that might be caused by the dose of niacin. You are thus using one
drug (an experimental agent in this case) to counteract the effects
of another drug (niacin). Although that might be a logical approach,
is it good medicine?
The concept of using a medication to
treat the adverse effects caused by another medication is fairly
common these days, though I recall a time in the past when that
would have been seriously frowned upon. I also recall numerous
approved over-the-counter products (such as the cold medication
Dimetapp) that were removed from the US market because they
contained combinations of drugs, one of which was eventually proven
to adversely affect health. Although I
think that permitting a rational mixture of drugs in a single
product is a better plan than banning drug combinations altogether,
I'm a bit confused about the FDA’s focus on the matter of drug
combinations. It seems like the rules are changing during the game.
Why is it necessary to introduce another
version of niacin? There is a slow-release version of niacin (Niaspan,
made by Abbott Laboratories) that is already on the market. When
asked about the "problem" of flushing that can be caused by niacin,
a spokesperson from Abbott reportedly said that facial flushing is
usually a temporary effect that can be easily managed with aspirin.
The question of whether laropiprant is safer than aspirin then
arises. Nobody has an answer for that one — yet. I wonder, though,
how long it will take — after FDA approval — before we notice some
problems with Cordaptive.
I don't have the confidence in drug
manufacturers that I had when I started in this field back in the
1960s. It seems that more and more drugs hit the market and then are
discovered to be harmful. If I was prescribing drugs and I decided
that niacin would be needed to lower someone's cholesterol levels,
I’m sure that I wouldn't be prescribing Cordaptive for many years.
My dad told me never to buy a new-model car until it had been on the
road for a few years. Let them work out the kinks on the other guy,
not me! I think that advice applies to using prescription drugs as
well.
You hear it all the time: "Ask your
doctor if OUR DRUG is right for you." If my doctor were to prescribe
Cordaptive for me, I'd promptly ask, "Is this really
necessary for me?"
Simvastatin is a
hypolipidemic drug belonging to the class of pharmaceuticals called
"statins". It is used to control hypercholesterolemia (elevated
cholesterol levels) and to prevent cardiovascular disease.
RETURN
Open 9:00 am to 5:00 pm
(CT)
Monday through Friday
Closed on major U.S. holidays
Our 100%
Satisfaction Guarantee.
If you are not delighted with anything you purchase from us, let us
know, and we'll do our best to fix it for you.
Disclaimer:
Any health related information is for educational purposes only.
None of the information provided here is to be construed as medical
advice. Before applying any therapy or use of herbs, you may want to
seek advice from your health care professional. The information on
our website should not be a substitute for physician evaluation or
treatment by a health care professional and is not intended to
provide or confirm a diagnosis.